Jenny Beth Martin is the Tea Party Patriots Honorary Chair.

 

Democrats’ demand for witnesses who didn’t testify in the House is ludicrous. A majority of the House impeached the president based on the evidence that was presented. That’s the evidence that should be presented to the Senate — no more, no less. Why should the two chambers be working off different sets of facts?

 

Steve Gruber: Party Patriots. Honorary chair Jenny Beth, welcome back to the program.
Jenny Beth Martin: Thanks so much for having me
Steve Gruber: So you're on the opinion of no Witnesses. I understand give me your thoughts.
Jenny Beth Martin: Yeah, I think that the I think that it would be better to have no Witnesses go through the evidence of the have presented and then make a decision on whether you need to impeach the president with the same set of facts that that how or to remove the from office or to acquit him rather. Those are the choices really before us with the same set of facts of the house used to impeach him on the the Democrats. Use the fact is it doesn't the house Democrats could have called all of these Witnesses and they chose not to do so,
Steve Gruber: they didn't even subpoena. John Bolton is an example John Bolton ever subpoenaed by the house and therefore it's hard for me to take seriously the House well we need to hear from John Bolton.

Enter your number to get our free mobile app